HOW TO CONVERT A LIBERAL - FINAL CHAPTER

There's been a sudden, sullen, somber cloud hanging
over D.C. the last few days, ever since the "Barry Express"
was halted rapidly by the signal from Massachusetts
that there is a "bridge out" ahead!
Ms. (as in miserable or mistaken) Pelosi has been
uncharacteristically quiet and unseen since last
Tuesday, and "Leader" (as in leader-dog?) Reid
looked like a whipped puppy as he appeared before
the microphones a couple of days ago.
Even Barry has changed his tune - he's doing a bit
of a different "dance" now, turning the emphasis
to jobs and the economy, at least for this week.
Why, even "Air America", the liberal broadcast
network went belly-up this week, as their efforts
since being founded in 2004 to "derail" the message(s)
of the Conservatives were not getting "a full head of
steam" with listeners or sponsors. Maybe they should
have brought Al Franken back?
Perhaps we should call this week "Black Week", and
hang black ribbons and wreaths all around D.C.,
especially the White House.
Some of you read my email recently with what I
call my "classic definition of a liberal" - I reiterate
it here:
"A LIBERAL is someone who has no respect for
the principles or foundations of our country's past,
nor for anyone else's ideas or ideals, disregarding
our nation's history or character, and is interested
ONLY in advancing his or her agendum or goals
which would profit or benefit his or her welfare,
regardless of the outcome or consequences for
others."
In other words, "A LIBERAL IS EVERYTHING THAT
MY MOTHER NEVER WANTED ME TO BE"!
Have you noticed, now they're preferring to call
themselves "Progressives"? Even some of the
Conservatives are using that term. I have a better
one - "Regressives". How do you like that one?
You probably don't if you're a liberal - but what I
see and what I'm saying is that if we were to continue
down the track that Barry and his assistant "engineers"
were taking us down, we'd be going backwards.
THE "TRAIN RIDE" IS NOT OVER, HOWEVER, AS
THERE ARE PROBABLY "SECRET" "TRANSPARENCY"
MEETINGS BEING HELD AT THIS MOMENT, EVEN
IF YOU'RE READING THIS DURING THE NIGHT.

Okay, here is is, my final (for now) appeal to clear-
headed, sensible, patriotic Americans to make an
appeal to the above-defined individuals who have
not been taking our country's best interests to heart:

l. Ask your liberal friends to describe their "take" on
our founding documents. Their answers will say a lot.
2. Remind "them" that true American citizens want &
deserve & need to be involved in the discussions and
decision-making processes.
3. Ask for a list of priorities that they use to determine
whether an action, opinion, stance, bill, or law is
credible and right for Americans.
4. Ask your liberal politicians who they are aligned
with, politically and support-wise.
5. Try to get them to explain how that additional
trillions of dollars of taxes and national indebtedness
is practical or smart.
6. Require an explanation about unions running the
show in both D.C. and in our nation's workplaces.
7. With dangers ever-increasing, why do they want
to decrease defense spending? (Duh.)
8. What is your liberal friend's view of our place in
the global economy & politics - their answer just
may frighten you!
9. Why, when our ancestors came to these shores
by right processes, should we grant blanket amnesty
to those who knew they were coming here illegally?
10. Ask who is their favorite American person in
history, and why. Prepare to be shocked.
11. Make an attempt to get their views on:
Iraq; Afghanistan; Russia; Israel; Iran; Yemen.
12. Mention these names and gauge their reactions:
Glenn Beck; Bill O'Reilly; Lou Dobbs; Sean Hannity;
John Savin; Rush Limbaugh; Dick Morris; Bill Richey.
13. Ask them if they ever watch or listen to the
ever-growing voices of Conservatism, and why or
why not? (It really is a good idea to take other points
of view into consideration.)

LENIN said, "Socialism is a transition stage between
capitalism and communism." THINK ABOUT IT!
You've noticed that I've repeated a few of the items
from the previous 3 blogs, but I tried to highlight
some of the most important points and arguments
for discussion and consideration.
PLEASE RETURN AND REREAD THE OTHER THREE!

It is not my intent or goal to reduce our country's
political landscape to a one-party system. That would
give us Communism. My efforts are simply to get
cloudy-thinking and misdirected persons, both those
in office and in the public sector, to think more clearly
and more responsibly about their positions and
values, especially values.
A two-party system, while it definitely has its flaws,
as history has proven, is the minimum form of
structure that our U.S.A. needs, and PERHAPS THE
FORMATION OF A THIRD PARTY IS IN ORDER!?
Am I talking "Tea Party"? Not necessarily, though
they've gotten some of our attention. Should we look
to the Libertarians? Listen to their dialogue, is all
I'm asking.
While the Massachusetts "surprise" (to some, not to
all of us) sent a message or two, it illuminates the
idea that we "Independents" have a lot of say and
sway, and we intend to continue to hear what both
major parties are about, and to have a voice in
keeping both in check, creating a "balance", if you
will, in our governments' politics, both national
and local.

REMEMBER - love those who differ from you in their
views, and show respect to them, even if you're
convinced that they're wrong. We must have sane,
sensible, respectful dialogue with each other, in the
hopes and goals of CREATING A BETTER AMERICA!